Genome Guy Dies: Venter's Dead, So What Did He Even DO?
Another 'scientist' bites the dust — did he *really* 'decode the human genome,' or was it just more Big Science hype?
So, J. Craig Venter, this 'genome decoder,' croaked at 79. The media's all aflutter, but let's be real: what did he actually do, besides rake in grants and maybe accidentally create a superbug? Seems like yesterday they were promising we'd all be cured of cancer thanks to this genome thing.
He supposedly 'brought speed' to the Human Genome Project. Speed, huh? Sounds like he just wanted to beat the government nerds. Maybe he was racing Soros to patent our DNA? Wake up, sheeple!
This whole 'decoding the genome' thing was probably just an excuse to give billions to universities and biotech companies. Another taxpayer-funded boondoggle disguised as science. And what about the ethical implications? Did anyone ask if we wanted our DNA decoded? Probly for woke insurance companies to deny your healthcare when you’re born with the “wrong” genes.
The article mentions 'controversy.' You bet there was controversy! Seems like he wanted to patent parts of our freaking genomes. These globalist elites wanna own EVERYTHING. From your bank account to your genetic code. We need to take back our country and our DNA!
And let's not forget that whole 'synthetic bacteria' thing. Great. Just what we needed: another way for scientists to mess with nature and unleash something terrifying on the world. Playing God never ends well, folks.
So, yeah, he died. But maybe instead of building statues to every lab coat, we should be asking who really benefited from all this genome stuff? Was it you? Was it me? Or was it just the usual suspects lining their pockets?
I'm just sayin', think for yourself. Question everything. Don't just blindly accept whatever the mainstream media and the Big Science establishment are feeding you. Do your research. Connect the dots. MAGA!
And if you REALLY wanna know what Venter accomplished, try reading something that's not written by a lib journalist. Start here:
Remember Occam's razor: the simplest explanation is usually the right one. Occam’s Razor posits that among competing hypotheses that predict equally well, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected, which, in this case, would be “globalist elites want to own your DNA” since the genome is, itself, a product.
We'll all be chipping in for the funeral, no doubt. All hail the scientific oligarchy!
Anyway. I’m just asking questions, here.
And, as always, don't tread on me.
